<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC
 "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN"
 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">
]>
<rdf:RDF
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>
<channel rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/index.xml">
<title>Patrick's playground</title>
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog</link>
<description>assorted horseparts with topping</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18T23:29:45+02:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-18T23_29_41.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-15T20_43_13.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-12T22_06_09.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T16_26_37.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T10_53_35.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-27T12_05_28.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-22T09_18_44.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_36_14.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_31_53.txt" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-04T01_46_20.txt" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-18T23_29_41.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-18T23_29_41.txt</link>
<title>Moar KDE things</title>
<dc:date>2008-07-18T23:29:41+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[So, KDE overlay is still metric tons of fun. With KDE 4.1 RC1 in and most things working there's not that much 
to do at the moment. svn is slowly showing the first sign of 4.2 as a few things are breaking every now and 
then. 
<br>
KOffice released an alpha 9 yesterday, and Civil added that to the overlay before I could do it. So in turn I 
had to outdo him by adding a live koffice ebuild. That seems to mostly work, so next I'll try to see what's 
wrong with the split ebuilds I've been experimenting with. Most likely some really small irrelevant piece I 
have not yet noticed, who knows.
<br><br>
We're all waiting for RC2 / final of KDE 4.1 now, that'll be the next big commit fight. If you want to 
discuss, annoy or do other things with us feel free to join #gentoo-kde4-live on irc.freenode.net.
<br><br>
In other news, portage has grown parallelization support in svn. You can now tell it how many ebuilds to 
process in parallel or limit it to a certain system load. I guess that will be one of the most popular 
features with end-users as you can now max out your dual quadcores all the time every time. Thanks Zac!]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-15T20_43_13.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-07.html#e2008-07-15T20_43_13.txt</link>
<title>KDE 4 RC1</title>
<dc:date>2008-07-15T20:43:13+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[I've been surprised today by the release of RC1 of KDE. As a reaction we've bumped the ebuilds in the kdesvn-portage overlay and are testing them as 
well as we can. Looks like a few things are still broken, but that should be fixed soon. <br><br>
Because plasma has had a bugfixing spree a short while ago it works on all my machines now, so I'm actually using kde-svn at the moment. An I like 
it. What I do notice though is that my "old" 2Ghz X2 is slowly becoming obsolete, I can't keep up with all the kids and their quads when it comes to 
compile speed. Anyone in the mood to donate a Phenom? ;)]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-12T22_06_09.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-12T22_06_09.txt</link>
<title>Benchmurks</title>
<dc:date>2008-06-12T22:06:09+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[I've been playing a bit with my newest toy and generated some shiny 
graphs. Here's the first one:

<br><br>
<img src="http://www.gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/graphs-ins.png">

<br><br>
And here's a second one:
<img src="http://www.gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/graphs-bar.png">

<br><br>

So what does it mean?
Very easy. The first graph is the install time of three applications. 
Guess who.
<br><br>
The second graph is the time to do two operations. Again, guess who does 
what.

<br><br>

Quite funny, isn't it?]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T16_26_37.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T16_26_37.txt</link>
<title>How to screw your users</title>
<dc:date>2008-06-02T16:26:37+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[So, all ~arch Gentooists, be careful if you are using an older kernel - 
there's a great coreutils update (6.12) that depends on a function that 
only 2.6.22 kernels and later provide. It will kill your system in quite 
amusing ways so that you are forced to reinstall an older coreutils 
version and/or boot a newer kernel.
<br>
Symptoms are e.g. "touch: Function not implemented" and can be found in 
bug 224483.
<br>
grrrrrreat ....]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T10_53_35.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-06.html#e2008-06-02T10_53_35.txt</link>
<title>Braindamage</title>
<dc:date>2008-06-02T10:53:35+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[* Error: dev-db/mysql-5.0.60-r1 failed.<br>
[snip]<br>
* The die message: <br>
*  Your machine must NOT be named localhost<br>
<br>
Dude, next you tell me I can't name my machine piece_of_junk ... 
<br><br>
I really don't like ebuilds telling me what to do and what not :)]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-27T12_05_28.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-27T12_05_28.txt</link>
<title>Breaking apache - We do what we must, because we can</title>
<dc:date>2008-05-27T12:05:28+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[So, like, I've been using apache a bit. At work. Because we have legacy 
apps that NEED apache and tomcat and other horrible things you should 
not have to know about.<br><br>
Now here's the One Meeeeeeeelion Dollar question: Why did the Gentoo 
Apache maintainers decide to kill the apache2ctl binary and link the 
init script to it instead? That way you lose many functions and wonder 
why the output for loaded modules somehow ... looks like a confused init 
script. It's a pointless invasive change that kills functionality for no 
reason. 
<br><br>
So once I've managed to work around this extra braindamage to a 
braindamaged application I'll try to find out who thought this was a 
good idea and see if I can convince this entity to change its mind.
<br><br>
*sigh* I'm getting to old for this stuff ...]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-22T09_18_44.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-22T09_18_44.txt</link>
<title>Cognitive dissonance</title>
<dc:date>2008-05-22T09:18:44+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[I just realized I misunderestimated one thing - 
<br><br>
People like spb, Misanthrop (oh wait, Phil, not Mis) and a few others 
were dissing Gentoo at every chance they had quite simply because they 
like it too much. See, the problem is that they committed themselves to 
a project they knew was not going to be liked by many and which pushed 
them away quite a bit from the rest of the userbase. 
<br>
So the only way to not feel bad about this is quite simply to badmouth 
Gentoo. It's not their fault that they feel bad, but there's another 
factor.
<br>
They couldn't just leave Gentoo. They had to be kicked out so they have 
an external reason why it sucks so much. 
<br><br>
And what do we learn from that? Who knows. ]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_36_14.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_36_14.txt</link>
<title>LOLGENTOO</title>
<dc:date>2008-05-21T00:36:14+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/lolgentoo.jpg">
<br>
kekeke zergrush!]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_31_53.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-21T00_31_53.txt</link>
<title>Bye bye larrythecow</title>
<dc:date>2008-05-21T00:31:53+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[As you might have noticed I, like all other ex-devs, have been removed 
from planet larrythecow. So now I don't have an audience to think of, 
and I won't feel bad if I say bad words. Yey!]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-04T01_46_20.txt">
<link>http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2008-05.html#e2008-05-04T01_46_20.txt</link>
<title>New Statistics</title>
<dc:date>2008-05-04T01:46:20+02:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>

<description><![CDATA[time emerge paludis
<pre>
real    141m13.965s
user    135m59.178s
sys     4m57.679s
</pre>
<br><br>
time emerge portage
<pre>
real    1m15.212s
user    1m8.604s
sys     0m6.580s
</pre>
So I guess my new development machine can install portage around 100 
times faster than paludis. Guess what I'll continue to use ...
<br>
And since I forgot USE="portage" again I can't even compare the runtime 
because it don't work, mon. It be broken ... (hint: EAPI1 is quite neat 
if you know how to handle it)
<br><br>
In other news, I'm guilty of evil sensationalism. (Oh noes!)<br>
As <a 
href="http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/ferdy/2008/05/03/on_cooperating_and_paludis_vulnerability"> 
Ferdy</a> notices it's not a security issue directly which I've 
mentioned. But what noone seems to notice is how subtle and subversive 
it is ... it's a classical microsoft, executing data - which leads to 
the intellectual challenge of crafting the data in a way that causes 
some subtle things to implode a bit further down the road. Well, noone 
has actually found a way to use that, so we're safe. Right? 
<br>
Meh.]]></description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
